U of A University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Pictures of chickens, flowers, wheat, a boy looking through a magnifying glass, irrigation pipe, soybean pods, and fruits and vegetables.

Cooperative Extension Service

Cooperative Extension Service

Agricultural Experiment Station


Search | Publications | Jobs | Personnel Directory | Links
County Offices | Departments

About Us

Find Us

For the Media

Agriculture

Aquaculture
       & Fisheries

Beef
Beekeeping
Corn
Cotton
Dairy
Forage/Pasture
Forestry
Grain Sorghum
Horses
Horticulture
      Commercial

Poultry
Rice
Soybean
Specialty Agriculture
Swine
Wheat

Links
Newsletters

Business & Communities

Families & Consumers

Health & Nutrition

Home & Garden

Natural Resources

4-H Youth Development

Public Policy Center

For Faculty & Staff

Giving

Dale Bumpers College
of Agricultural, Food &
Life Sciences


Division Home


Agricultural Experiment
      Station Home


Cooperative Extension
      Service Home

 

Cotton Production in Arkansas
Response to the Challenges of 2006

Overview of 2005:

Second best crop ever 1011 lb lint/A - 1114 lb/A in 2004 standing record.
We rank 3rd behind California and Arizona.

We picked 2.2 m bales breaking our previous record of 2.085 m last year.
We ranked 2nd behind TX (last year, 2004, we were 3rd behind Mississippi, prior to that we are generally 4 to 5)

We did this in spite of a dry year. A few well timed rains and a hefty irrigation bill were dominating factors (we are 75% irrigated). Perhaps set a new record for production costs as well.

We appear to be locked into a situation where record or near record yields are necessary to stay in business. Going into the 2005 crop year our 10-year yield average is 804 lb lint/A and a 5-year average of 889 lbs of lint/A.

Outlook for 2006:

There will be fewer cotton farmers in 2006. Some are getting out or retiring before they lose any more equity. Some getting out because there is not a choice. Finances are tough. Lack of significant rainfall has cast great doubt as to the outlook for this season.

This season I have started my production talks with the above information. I have used this to stage recommendations for getting off to a good start.

Soil Samples – We must know what we have to work with or to work around. To do this samples for nematodes as well as fertility are necessary.

Start clean – Regardless of the tillage system or cover crops used, we must be clean at planting. The uses of residual herbicides are necessary to stay clean and to aid in a resistance management program to help sustain the viability of glyphosate.

Variety/Technology Selection – Don’t make widespread changes in varieties or technologies based on one year experience. A bag of the new BGII/RF cotton can cost as much as $500 if ordered with seed treatments to include a nematicide, insecticide, and fungicide products. This includes a technology fee that can be as much as $64/A for the BGII/RF. A bag of seed will plant around five acres. We recommend growers plant 2/3 of their farm with varieties they are familiar with and that will work on their farm. Experiment with new varieties and technologies on about 10% of the farm. Things that look good in the experimental portion last year may be expanded into the remaining ¼ of the farm. This allows a producer to gain knowledge and experience with new varieties or technologies while maintaining stability.

Insect control – Gus has stressed the importance of following the University recommendation for control of insect pests. Automatic sprays for the sake of convenience has little benefit and can often have great consequences if made in the absence treatment levels of pest populations. As an example, many producers made many more insecticide applications for plant bugs than was made in our CRVP fields. We made 1.2 applications. I have visited with many who made 4 – 5 applications.

Timing of inputs – Cotton is very sensitive to irrigation timings. Lack of proper timing of the initial irrigation can be costly in terms of lost yield potential. Timing of subsequent irrigations is also critical to maintain earliness and yield potential. Fertility rates may be lowered as timing of application is more in sync with plant needs. This will require more field by field management.

Crop Monitoring and Termination - Monitoring NAWF (nodes above white flower) beginning at first flower is a very effective tool to help gauge the potential of a field. Fields with a high potential may be pushed to help capture the additional potential. Cutout is established based on NAWF values (NAWF=5). Cutout defines the last effective boll population or the last group of boll that will contribute to significantly to yield and profit. Guidelines for insecticide and irrigation termination and harvest aide timings are based on this population of bolls.

Cotton is a perennial. To make money with a crop that grows and responds to the environment more like a tree than our other row crop commodities we not only worry about doing the right thing, we have to do it at the right time. It is becoming more and more critical to base management on a field by field basis. There is not much to cut. We can increase efficiency of our inputs by paying particular attention to when and how we make them. Doing things right the first time will help avoid problems associated with replanting or retreating fields for pests, to helping maintaining earliness and the yield and fiber quality potentials necessary to stay in business.


© 2006
University of Arkansas
Division of Agriculture
All rights reserved.
Last Date Modified 01/15/2010
Webmaster

University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture
Cooperative Extension Service
2301 South University Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 • USA
Phone (501) 671-2000 • Fax (501) 671-2209
 

MissionDisclaimerEEO
PrivacyFOI